|
Artforum
November 1991
CONSTANCE
MALLINSON
Municipal Art Gallery
Constance Mallinson is concerned
with the mediation of landscape painting by photography,
specifically the idealized, picturesque vista commonly associated
with National Geographic and Life magazines. During
the '80's her explorations took the form of large grids of small
landscape vignettes appropriated from photographic sources and then
restructured to form larger pictographic panoramas. Such
arrangements forced us to recognize our view of the landscape as a
received, ideological doxa, in which nature is not only
framed for the delectation of monocular perspective but also made
safe, via notions such as the Sublime, reflecting an Enlightenment
conception of subjectivity and faith in inevitable historical
progress.
However, the traditional framing of
easel painting, with its retinally centered view of the landscape,
tended to reinforce exactly what Mallinson was trying to
deconstruct. In her latest project, an ambitious installation
entitled Endless Painting, 1989-11991, the vignettes are
composed horizontally within 15 18-foot-long panels arranged as a
circular frieze around the entire gallery. The work's subject is the
history of the world, so Mallinson is able to indict our snapshot
view of history and landscape (and, by extension,
history-as-landscape) in a single blow. The frieze begins with the
world's primordial origins (a volcanic eruption) and gradually
traces the evolution of civilization through mankind's various
monuments (the Pyramids, Stonehenge, Renaissance Venice) to the
modern age (space, the atom bomb, freeway traffic jams). The work
ends with an image of a sage old mountain goat gazing into an
uncertain (represented as blank space) as vignettes of the Gulf War
and a mountain of tires bring up his rear.
Mallinson's achievement lies less in
her ability to deconstruct historicism-as-representation than in the
creation of a work that forces the viewer into undertaking the very
kinds of reading that it also critiques. Instead of encouraging us
to make choices, to privilege this over that, Mallinson deliberately
reduces her subjects to nonhierarchical signifiers. It becomes less
a pictorialism of metaphor and signification than one of
multiplicity and flow. World War II, the creation of the world, and
ancient Greek civilization all get the same space and attention
regardless of their historical import. Rather than frame each
vignette as a clearly delineated autonomous "event,"
Mallinson blurs the edges so that each scene elides with the next.
The obvious visual paradigm is the moving automobile, in which the
landscape becomes a series of fragmentary instances in an endless
pictorial and semantic drift. History and landscape are thus
transformed into remembered icons and allegorical ruins, so that
major historical events, natural phenomena, and the landscapes of,
say, Claude Lorrain and Caspar David Friedrich are reduced to the
same photoarchival function as photojournalism and the travelogue.
All power lies in the hands of the allegorist, whether it be
Mallinson, the viewer, or an advertising art director.
Yet a closer reading discloses
discreetly hidden formalisms in which Mallinson employs metonymic
association to create metatexts that crisscross the dominant
historical chronology, creating new trajectories. Thus a simple
signifying continuum including a dust bowl, a TVA power station, a
Nazi rally, a fighter plane, an atomic explosion, and a statue of
Mao ca all be recontextualized as a power chain (natural,
industrial, political, military, nuclear, ideological), which also
signifies a transition from a prewar-regulated economy to a postwar
society of the spectacle. Similarly, Mallinson's use of a recurring
horizon line acts as a formal continuity between vignettes,
reiterating the cone-of-vision perspective of traditional landscape
painting as the dominant visual template for the frieze as a whole.
What seemed to be a pictorialism of filmic flow is now revealed to
stubbornly cling to the pictorial language of 16th-century painting.
In true Nietzschean fashion, Mallinson transforms history into art,
only then to disclose and celebrate art as deception and lies.
– Colin Gardner
|
|