|
Artweek
December 17, 1983 Cumulative
Landscapes Los Angeles/Robert
Ewing Constance Mallinson
has become known over the past few years for abstract paintings in
which repetitive design motifs, arranged in grids or bands,
materialized through the tiniest of flecks and strokes of pure hues.
But constrained within this minimalist structure was a landscape
sensibility that expressed itself in a feeling for rhythmically
varying densities of tone, suggesting an atmosphere of natural
light, movement and space. In her latest paintings at Neil G. Ovsey
Gallery, Mallinson has abolished the constraint. The result is an
outpouring of landscape ideas that are literally dizzying in concept
and execution. Although aspects of these can be linked to her
earlier work, what is most striking in this exhibition is the manner
in which Mallinson has achieved an entirely new, imaginative
reordering of her esthetic sensibility. The
best of these paintings are not singular views of a particular vista
or expressions of a particular phenomenon. Instead, each painting is
a kind of hodgepodge encyclopedia of various types of landscape,
presented as we have come to know them through popular culture. Each
canvas is covered in patchwork fashion with a series of small
landscape vignettes (as many as sixty to eighty scenes in a single
paining), with every vignette a copy of another image. Scanning
these large paintings is like looking into a kaleidoscope filled
with mixed tourist views from National Geographic and
drugstore postcards. Weltanschauung,
for example, is a typical compilation and, as its title implies, a
summation if ever there was one. Besides the requisite skies,
mountains, lakes, waterfalls and meadows, there are rows of palm
trees, a petrified forest, hot-springs geysers, Dutch windmills, oil
derricks, urban skylines, Big Ben, a Monet haystack, Church's Niagara,
Smithson's Spiral Jetty and, smack-dab in the center, a
shard of a Clyfford Still. Certainly Mallinson's wit is not the
least of her virtues. These
paintings, clearly, are about ways in which we receive the constant
flow of images from our surrounding culture and how they then
condition our responses to nature and image making. But the
paintings are neither images of despair or irony, nor are they mere
conglomerations of fragmented images – they do not add up to a
postmodernist essay. Mallinson transforms the ubiquitous nature of
cultural imagery by taking it at face value. Each
vignette or fragment of a landscape is a representational scene
built up into clearly recognizable parts and phenomena by a fairly
loose stroke. The approach is varied enough, adapting itself to the
requirements of the particular image and ranging from silhouettes to
quick cursive strokes to long drags of paint that echo landscape
forms. The viewer's eye willingly enters each space and, just as
willingly, moves along, led by Mallinson's carefully constructed
liaisons and juxtapositions. Mountain slopes become shorelines which
become horizons over meadows – all in an easy flow from one view
to another, though witty juxtapositions of impossibilities sometimes
provide a change of pace. Moreover,
for each painting Mallinson has utilized a landscape convention or
organizing principle that gives the work a landscape
"feel" apart from and with more resonance than the
fragmented scenes. In Trees,
patches of parallel forms in a heavily textures ground resemble the
blotchy appearance of rough bark. For All and For None is a
panoramic vision with shorelines on the bottom, skies and clouds at
the top and passages along the way that travel from meadows to
waterfalls to mountains. And Black and White United States
(charcoal on paper) is a "map" with swamps and alligators
of the deep South in the lower right corner and the Cascade range
peaks in the "Northwest," or upper left corner. Mallinson's
energy and artistic intelligence shine through these works with a
clear radiance. If, in part, they are about received images, they
are also, as a much-larger part, about "the artist's ability to
reaffirm our deepest instincts and transcend cultural limitations. |



|